[adjective][species] on cub porn
Author: bastett
[adjective][species] has an interesting article on cub porn and its impact on the furry community. Controversial topic but worth a read.
On sites where it is allowed (and even sometimes when it is not), it’s ubiquitous. A full 3% (out of 200,000) of posts on e621.net are tagged “cub”. Yet attraction to underage characters is discussed as if it existed in the extreme margins of furry.
The prevalence of cub porn suggests that a significant minority of furries are paedophiles. Or, to use a less inflammatory phrase, many furries are sexually attracted to underage characters.
Find the full article here: flayrah – furry food for thought
Creative Commons: Full post may be available under a free license.






brilliant article, every furry should read this.
This is an article? Seems like something you’d read on a forum post. Not that I don’t agree with the sentiments, but my take on this issue is if they are not harming real children, leave them alone. It’s like violent video games. Once you remove the one place they go to kill fake people in peace, they’re going to go out and kill real people.
Somehow I doubt that most players of violent games, if you took away their violent games, would go out and kill real people to compensate. Probably the same goes for cub porn fans: most likely wouldn’t have sex with real anthropomorphic children if their cub porn were taken away. Anyway, you can tell it’s a blog post because it totally reads like he has a minimum word requirement, like when he goes off on pedophilia tangents. Pedophiles are more likely to be shorter and left-handed? How relevant! Oh yes, and you can tell that it’s an article instead of a forum post because he uses references and statistics, just not very well. A whopping 3% of posts on e621.net are tagged “cub”? Wow, I always thought it was marginal! This isn’t in my opinion the best-articulated or most effective pro-cub porn article, but I appreciate any logical dialogue on the subject. &i